> The restaurant is NOT a victim. Whoever is responsible for the actual > purchase is an adult, right? Is in a so-called responsible position, right? > Well, doesn't it stand to reason it was that person's RESPONSIBILITY to > check out the purchase BEFORE buying? > > I highly suspect that it was just another "deal" whereby the restaurant > wanted the moon but was willing to pay for a speck of dirt. I highly suspect > that those who have had to play that piano have complained about it since > day one! I highly suspect the restaurant is very aware of its condition. > Their position probably is: They have a beautiful piece of furniture that > makes a sound....why is the piano player complaining, the customers aren't. > (This is why I don't tune for restaurants anymore!) > > We technicians are NOT responsible for the mistakes of others. We can, and > should imho, inform the owner(s) - be it restaurant, school, individual, > whoever - of the current condition of the piano. If the owner wants to seek > recompense, it is THEIR responsibility, not ours. > > Caveat Emptor! > > End of rant. Thank you for letting me vent. ;-) > > Gina > > PS I'm sorry your hands hurt, but why did you continue to play for four > hours????? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Bondi" <tito@PhilBondi.com> > To: "Pianotech List" <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 8:17 AM > Subject: Hurricane Andrew piano? > > > > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC