Richard Moody wrote: > The "aural only" tuners are convinced they can do MUCH better than a > machine, dave > _____________________________ > David M. Porritt > > NOT this aural tuner. I posted my sentiments on that seven times. > (actually my mail software messed up. sorry) Once was enough I had hoped. > ; ) > > Again I don't think good aural tuners are much better than machines. I > don't think machines are any better than good aural tuners. Both have > their pluses and minuses. > ............................................ I think a carefull and considered reading of most opinions on the aural side of the fence would reveal this same basic stance. I certainly aggree 100 % with Ric Moody on this. Indeed, thats quite a bit of why I make such a point of useing and continuing to develope ones "ear only" skills. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC