Update to: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner

[John Ross]

I stand corrected.
I must have had the second model.
I know there was another model, that was different, that was a Tuners Supply
model.
It might have had an LCD screen, I just can't remember.
Thank you Don.
Regards,
John M. Ross
Windsor, Nova Scotia.
jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don" <pianotuna@accesscomm.ca>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Update to: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner


> Hi John,
>
> The early SAT was a six volt unit. A lead acid gel cell to be exact.
>
> At 10:19 PM 4/19/02 -0300, you wrote:
> >Actually, I think the SOT that had the 6V battery, was a modification,
made
> >by Tuners Supply.
> >I think there was a legal case between, Inventronics and Tuners Supply,
> >which died when Tuners Supply, went under.
> >I started out with a SOT, that had two 9V batteries, and I have upgraded
a
> >couple of times. I now have the SATlll, and am well satisfied, and never
> >regretted, the upgrading. The SATlll, does all, I require,
> >in fact, I do not utilize half of it's potential.
> >However, if I was younger, I would be tempted to try the Verituner.
> >Regards,
> >John M. Ross
> >Windsor, Nova Scotia.
> >jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Greg T" <Tunapiana440@cox.net>
> >To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> >Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:53 PM
> >Subject: Update to: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner
> >
> >
> >> OK...I called Inventronics. The woman who answered the phone said they
> >have
> >> nothing at all to do with the Hale SOT. She said I could send it to
> >Richard
> >> Wineberger as he advertises in the Journal as someone who repairs them.
> >So,
> >> I explained that there is nothing wrong with mine but that I just need
a
> >new
> >> battery and wanted to find a schematic for it in case I encountered
> >problems
> >> with it in the future. She then proceeded to tell me (with a slight
> >> "attitude" detected in her voice) that I shouldn't really be fooling
> >around
> >> with a device that old anyway (basically bad-mouthing their own
product)
> >and
> >> that the new Accu-Tuner was the most accurate instrument around now
> >anyway.
> >> She said that it probably would be the last tuning device I would ever
> >need
> >> to buy...for $1700.00...
> >>
> >> Sorry, maam, I don't THINK so...
> >>
> >> I was able to find a battery for it. I guess I won't worry about the
> >> schematics.
> >>
> >> Thanks to all who have tried to assist.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Greg
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "J Patrick Draine" <draine@attbi.com>
> >> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> >> Cc: "J Patrick Draine" <draine@attbi.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:35 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 12:31 PM, Greg T wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Thanks for the info. If I had known that I would have searched the
> >> > > Inventronics site first...
> >> > >
> >> > > However...since reading your (Patricks) reply I did pay a visit to
> >> > > Inventronics website and I cannot find a phone number or email
address
> >> > > where I could contact Al Sanderson...
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Inventronics: 1-800-FAST-440
> >> > 978 256 7374
> >> > inventrncs@aol.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
> Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.M.T., R.P.T.
>
> mailto:pianotuna@accesscomm.ca
> http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/
>
> 3004 Grant Rd.
> REGINA, SK
> S4S 5G7
> 306-352-3620 or 1-888-29t-uner
>
>