Richard, Ron
I have never seen any postings that indicate Richard has no use for physics.
Although we may sometimes disagree on the conclusions drawn or the appropriate use of
physical methods surely it is not necessary to be dismissive in what is, supposedly, a
forum for discussion.
Regards, Robin Hufford
Richard Brekne wrote:
> Ron Nossaman wrote:
>
> > This is always precisely the tack taken by the crank who has no substantial
> > basis for his belief.
>
> Why yes... it is :)
>
> > You even threw in religion.
>
> Why yes... I Did :)
>
> > You've already indicated that you have no use for physics, so this will always
> > be a pointless
> > exercise on my pard. I won't waste any more time on you.
> >
> > Ron N
>
> That would be acceptable :) But then I have heard this before. And for the
> record.. I have never indicated that I have no use for physics.... actually I have
> indicated quite the opposite. Think about it.
>
> Fact is, whether you like it or not.... there are tons of folks out their that
> disagree all the time, each and every one with plenty of good rational sound
> reasoning on their side. That is all I have pointed out... (or perhaps
> underscored) and it seems precious little, while painfully truthfull still, to
> result in hurt feelings or irritations.... still... so be it.
>
> --
> Richard Brekne
> RPT, N.P.T.F.
> Bergen, Norway
> mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
> http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
>
> "We'll meet again....... don't know where... don't know when...." :)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC