Agreed. Thank you kindly, I was beginning to think I was going off the deep end again. :) RicB Ron Nossaman wrote: > > >It's obvious to me that you do not understand the word "Shear". Shear is any > >direction. It just depends on what plane it is in. In the case of bridge > >pins/bridges it is horizontal shear or sideways shear. Get it? > > > >Joe Garrett, RPT, (Oregon) > > A force perpendicular to a plane produces stress at the interface between > the acting, and the acted upon. A force parallel to a plane produces a > shear stress at the interface between the acted and acted upon. Any benefit > of CA around bridge pins in an otherwise structurally sound bridge is in > increasing compression resistance of the wood and filling the gap on the > compression side of the hole. It soaks into the fibers and reinforces them. > It also is a reasonably decent gap filler under compression (as long as > it's contained), which is, again, what it does in a bridge. CA's shear > strength has no bearing whatsoever on it's suitability for this use, since > there is no demand on the glue at all for shear strength. It's relatively > poor shear and tensile strength make CA a bad choice for repairing split > bridges, in my opinion, but there still ain't no shear on a CA glue joint > in an un-split bridge pin hole that is of any consequence to the > suitability of the choice of CA for the repair in the first place, no > matter who arbitrarily says that shear is any stress in any direction. > > Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC