This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment So here's a question for all you action geo-philes out there. I'm = replacing a set of hammers and shanks. The shank pinning is virtually = frictionless at present. The balance weight is 42 g, but the downweight = is only 50 grams in the center (i.e. 8 grams of friction). When I = replace the shanks the friction will go up by probably 3-4 grams in the = center. The pianist says she likes the current weight and doesn't want = to change it. Is she responding to the balance weight or the = downweight? Will she be happier with a 42 balance weight and 53 - 54 = grams of downweight where it was once 50, or will she be happier with a = reduced balance weight that yields a similar downweight with the = increase in friction? Something else to think about. David Love=20 =20 =20 ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/e8/bd/96/fb/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC