Early on we planned on doing this very thing. However, we were told it wouldn't work that way and the whole bridge had to be done at one time. I don't recall what explanation was given, but to my mind (weak though it may be), if the Wapin idea was going to make a difference in performance that difference should show up in this kind of test. I could not, and still can not, conceive of any reason why not having the Wapin bridge pin configuration on one unison should adversely affect the adjacent unison having it. In the end we set the project aside and didn't proceed with any installation of the Wapin. The piano we had intended to use for the experiment was subsequently remanufactured according to our own standard procedures and sold to a very happy customer. Del. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Nossaman" <RNossaman@KSCABLE.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: January 28, 2002 8:53 PM Subject: Re: Wapin bridge > >I was wondering if everything else was exactly the same. When trying to > >determine > >if changes actually are improvements part of the problem is isolating the > >change > >you're interested in from all the other changes. > > This is why I and a few other folks out there have suggested that > Wapinizing every other unison throughout the scale of a demo piano would be > a very informative indication of what the difference really is. > > > Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC