no comp. was Re: Saying "No" (was Convention is focused)

[Delwin D Fandrich]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Wimblees@AOL.COM=20
  To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
  Sent: July 21, 2002 1:42 PM
  Subject: Re: no comp. was Re: Saying "No" (was Convention is focused)


  In a message dated 7/21/02 4:32:53 PM !!!First Boot!!!, =
BobDavis88@AOL.COM writes:=20



    Instructors teach at the most two classes. That's two periods out of =
a=20
    >  possible 20. That 10%. ....Why should instructors get free =
registration,=20
    plus a >stipend of some sorts,=20

    Because the attendees are getting the benefit of MUCH more than 1.5 =
hours=20
    (*2) of the instructor's time. The instructor doesn't just walk in =
and start=20
    talking. Even after teaching at many conventions, I still spend =
NUMEROUS=20
    hours revising the material to make it as clear and efficient as =
possible,=20
    and I can't count the hours before the first one I taught at. =
Knowing the=20
    subject is one thing, but preparing it to be useful to 100 people, =
with=20
    differing levels of experience and different learning styles, is =
quite=20
    another.=20



  Bob=20

  Everything you say is true. But everyone who teaches a class has spent =
time prior to coming to a convention to prepare for it. That is what we =
all do. But how do we get compensated for that? Is free registration =
enough? Is one night's lodging enough? No, it is not. If we truly wanted =
to get paid back, it would cost the PTG too much. And how do we =
compensate for someone who has taught the same class five or six   =
times? There are  classes I teach where I just have to get out my notes, =
and I'm ready to go.=20


You're contradicting yourself here, Wim. You either spend time preparing =
for a convention or you don't. If you don't, you should be. Don't you =
see any problem with presenting exactly the same class five or six =
times? How many times is that class going to help attract me--or anyone =
else, for that?--back to a convention? I'll go to most classes once. =
Some, I'll go to twice. But, Lew Herwig's classes were the only ones =
I've gone to more than that and they were never the same twice running. =
Nowadays, when the upcoming convention class schedule arrives in the =
mail and I look down the list and see the same class offered by the same =
instructor that I went to last year or five years ago--sorry--been =
there, done that.=20

When I hear someone going on about how wonderful all of the great =
classes are at the conventions, I have to wonder how many conventions =
they have attended. Usually, it's not many. There are too many of our =
members who no longer attend conventions regularly--if at all--because =
they've been to most of classes that are offered on a regular basis and =
they don't see enough new and interesting in the lineup whet the =
appetite. These folks are simply not willing to invest the time and =
spend the money each year for those few classes that are new enough or =
different enough or advanced enough. So, they start skipping a year or =
two here and there until finally they just don't bother at all.=20

There is only room for so much at each convention and with so much aimed =
toward drawing in relatively new and inexperienced bodies, they are =
going to increasingly leave out the very people who have worked hard to =
raise them to the level they have now achieved.=20

Now this may be an ideal scenario for you and Richard. It is not for me, =
nor is it for many others. The last I heard, PTG, and its annual =
convention, is supposed to be serving all of the membership, not just =
those who are beginners and those who find themselves at some =
intermediate skill level. But that is what is gradually happening.

I would suggest that most instructors who are presenting classes much =
beyond the elementary level have been attending conventions somewhat =
longer than average. Certainly they have been by the time they have =
gained much experience at teaching. That means they have already had the =
opportunity to attend your classes--you know, those you can repeat each =
year without any preparation by using the same old handouts--at least =
once or twice. Maybe five or six times if they didn't get it right the =
first few times. And they've probably managed to attend most of the =
other standards at least once or twice as well. Couple this history with =
the inevitable and unavoidable scheduling conflicts and as each year =
goes by there are fewer and fewer classes of interest to choose from.=20

This year there were four classes listed in the class schedule I found =
of interest that I haven't already taken. Combined, these four may have =
been enough to get me to Chicago. Probably not, but at least I'd have =
considered making the trip. And this was a good year--there have been =
some years when there haven't been that many. Now, in Chicago this year =
I taught a total of 9 hours (every hour of which required more =
preparation time than my partner or my family wants to even think about) =
and all but one of those four classes was scheduled for a period during =
which I also was teaching.=20

So, with that class schedule you and Richard would have happily pay for =
my own air fare to Chicago, pay a full (or only slightly reduced) =
registration fee, pay for four or five nights at an overpriced hotel =
eating overpriced (but otherwise exceptionally forgettable) meals and =
lose a weeks work, not to mention the work and family time I gave up to =
prepare for the thing. Oh, yes, I was able to pick up a 'free' drink at =
the Steinway reception.

Now, with respect to Ron Nossaman, his class on bridges--while very =
good--was simply not worth all that. It would have been cheaper and =
taken far less time to simply have flown directly to Wichita and had him =
give it to me personally.

Much like the 1980s, our conventions seem to have reached something of a =
plateau. (We can forgive Richard who, in spite of his rhetoric, wasn't =
around PTG then and so can't really be expected to know much about those =
days. But you were.) They are losing their attraction to an =
unacceptable--and, I think, growing--number of long-term and highly =
experienced members. And they are losing an unacceptable number of =
capable and experienced instructors. These are some of the best people =
we have. These are people who don't just grab last year's outline and =
hop on a plane. True, there will always a fresh supply of newcomers =
willing to be exploited, but unless we make begin now to make some =
fundamental changes we are going to find ourselves locked into a =
continually repeating downhill cycle.

If the membership ultimately decides this cycle is actually desirable, =
then so be it--I'll not be around all that much longer anyway. It won't =
affect me all that much. However, don't you then be surprised as you =
watch the vitality that has fueled and driven our organization and its =
conventions toward excellence dwindle and ultimately slid into =
mediocrity. Or will you even notice? Presenting the same class year =
after year after year is mediocrity and I know you are capable of more =
than that. Mediocrity is never acceptable, and we can't afford it. =
Especially when the rest of our industry is already struggling under its =
own ponderous mass of stagnation. And yet mediocrity seems to be just =
what you are presenting as not only acceptable, but desirable.

Our conventions do not offer much to the relatively advanced technician. =
They can't really--there are no longer many instructors at that level =
who are willing to bear the financial and personal cost themselves and =
we've been letting them fade into the sunset. Sure, there are always =
some bright folks coming up through the ranks, but we'll soon burned =
them out just as those who have gone before.=20

We claim to value the kind of experience and knowledge these people are =
working hard to attain--until it comes time to pay for it. And then we =
say we don't need to. Our convention are great just the way they are. =
And, yes, our conventions are a good educational value for some. Less =
so, however, for a growing number of those who have worked and struggled =
hard to raise themselves above the average. You may be willing to write =
these folks off; I am not.

At this point I'm not suggesting that PTG actually pay instructors--that =
will have to wait for another day and probably another generation. A day =
when we are willing go beyond just talking about being professionals and =
become willing to pay whatever price is necessary to actually become =
professionals. In the meantime this we can do: we can make it less =
difficult for those who are willing to keep coming back each year to =
educate us in the manner to which we've become accustomed. It is neither =
reasonable nor fair for those who expect to profit from the experience, =
knowledge, time and work of convention "volunteers" (of all varieties) =
and instructors to demand that it be given to them free of charge. There =
ain't no free lunch, folks. Especially at the hotels PTG typically =
chooses for its convention sites.

Del


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/67/88/28/c8/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--