David Love wrote: >Richard: > >That's why I wrote "in effect" you change the SBR. You don't actually >change it, but the net effect is that you can maintain the consistent >relationship between SW and FW that you would otherwise only be able to >achieve with equal SBR's. This is done by transferring some of the FW to >the assist spring. > >David Love > > >> Ok boys... I see your point and will think on it for a few days to see if I like it enough...:) The thing that makes me itch a bit about the cranium is that a real change in SBR also carries with it a few other implications that I dont think are quite covered here. Bill Ballard wrote.. >Ric Brekne wrote: >Hmmm.... I dont know about this analogy...grin... sounds more like confusing >Water Buffaloes with Argentian Whitzie Flies to me. :) This example is actually easy to keep straight. The latter are always found swarming around the backside of the former, not visa versa. Grin... I actually didnt think of this particular connexion when you first mention it... quite amuzzing. :) RicB Richard Brekne RPT NPTF Griegakadamiet UiB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC