This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Actually, this is a part of the motion being put before the Board at the = convention concerning whether we should have another classification of = "Allied Tradesman" which would be someone who rebuilds and/or = refinishes pianos but does not tune.=20 Start thinking about it now. It's going to come up. I'm neither for = it or against it.=20 I believe that that's the reason this whole thread got started anyway.=20 =20 Kevin E. Ramsey ramsey@extremezone.com ----- Original Message -----=20 From: JIMRPT@aol.com=20 To: pianotech@ptg.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:01 AM Subject: Re: Piano Refinishing In a message dated 04/06/02 9:38:22 AM, grandrestorations@yahoo.com = writes: << My point is that just because you're not interested, or I'm not interested, doesn't mean that no one is interested or that it's not important or significant. >> Brian...... Absolutely no offense taken.......but read what I wrote :-) .....I = didn't=20 say I "wasn't interested"........ what I 'was' speaking to was the=20 speculation of 'why there are not more refinishing articles in the = JOURNAL'=20 ........and I spoke to conserving, but not restricting, the JOURNAL = space for=20 more direct technical thingees that are piano specific......I even = mentioned=20 that some refinishing articles would be welcomed by me................ = Now=20 just how much more accomdating could I be?? ;-) Are we separated by a common language this morning???? Jim Bryant (FL) ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/b0/ce/02/c1/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC