Mark, This could well be what I have been experiencing. On my last job I was afraid to sand down too much as I had gone through the veneer once already and I'm not very good, yet , at patching areas like that. I didn't want to make another problem for myself so I treated any additional sanding very gingerly. Greg At 10:19 PM 6/6/2002, you wrote: > > In a message dated 06/06/02 5:04:37 PM, gnewell@ameritech.net > > writes: > > > > << Now, how about the difference between a > > sanding sealer and something else like ... say ... shellac. I have > > been told that a coat of shellac will even out how wood takes stain. Do > > > you find this to be the case?>> > >Hi Greg - > >Yes, shellac can perform the function of 'wood conditioner' quite well. >Best is to use it very thin - ie. 1/2 lb. cut. If spraying, you CAN mist >it on, but better, more even performance can be had by flooding the >surface and immediately wiping the excess off. Gives the thirsty cells a >chance to act more like the denser sections when applying stain. Of >course, you could also use a rag for application. You gotta work quick! > >I have to wonder if your some of your splotchiness, or muddy-look comes >from not completely removing the filler so that it is truly just left 'in >the pores'. Any left on the surface will really give you a muddy look. >I have found that scotchbright pads are great for removing that last haze >of filler without as much danger of removing wood and color as sandpaper. > The maroon pad is aggressive enough to perform this task well. > >Mark Potter >bases-loaded@juno.com > Greg Newell mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC