Terry, I met David when he was manning the RCT table at the CyberCafe in Reno, and picked his brain about Historic Temperaments. I believe he tunes the historic keyboard instruments at the Smithsonian. I expect his class will be very worthwhile. Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: Farrell <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 6:09 AM Subject: Re: Historic tuning modes snip-- > > BTW, who is David Lamoreaux? Doesn't he come from a family of French felt makers? Anyone aware of his background with non-equal temperaments? > > Terry Farrell > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Kanter" <jkanter@rollingball.com> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:09 AM > Subject: Re: Historic tuning modes > > > Newton said: > > Maybe the final version should have a "significant" category to help > > determine it's historical significant. Obviously 200 HTs would have > > quite a few that were less significant than others in terms of who, when > > and where they were used. > > I'd greatly welcome any educated opinions about which are significant. Also, > there is a good bit of overlap (e.g. 2 versions of Werckmeister III. One of > them is 7.8 cents lower than the other, but the offset pattern is > identical... see the numbers immediately below. I could discard the one that > has A at -7.8 cents...) > > C +3.9 +11.7 > C# -5.9 +2.0 > D -3.9 +3.9 > D# -2.0 +5.9 > E -5.9 +2.0 > F +1.9 +9.8 > F# -7.8 0.0 > G 0.0 +7.8 > G# -3.9 +3.9 > A -7.8 0.0 > A# 0.0 +7.8 > B -3.9 +3.9 > > Here are the temperaments I have now... > > MAJOR SNIP!!!! > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC