Well, he just didn't add RPT after his name...FWIW... David I. ----- Original message ----------------------------------------> From: Farrell <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com> To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org> Received: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:20:48 -0400 Subject: Re: Testing Statistics.. was Important Question >Boy, I dunno John. Maybe from the standpoint of being a good aural tuner you "did it >wrong". But if you have been tuning for 27 years, have a university contract, have had >no complaints, and have made a good living at it, hmmmmmm - I'd say you did somethi >Terry Farrell > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "John Ross" <jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca> >To: <ilvey@sbcglobal.net>; "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> >Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 2:49 PM >Subject: Re: Testing Statistics.. was Important Question >> Hi David, >> I agree with you 100%. >> I am one who did it the wrong way. I started with the ETD too early, >> and never was able to pass the aural part of the exam. >> I turn 65 this year, and have been tuning since 1975. I have made a >> good living at it, and had no complaints from my customers. I have an >> ongoing contract with a University. I know I will never have the >> incentive to try the aural exam again. >> Best regards, >> John M. Ross >> Windsor, Nova Scotia. >> jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca >SNIP >_______________________________________________ >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC