Bent, kerfed, and epoxied? Who said anything at all about that? I don't understand what you are referring to. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "gordon stelter" <lclgcnp@yahoo.com> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 1:18 PM Subject: Re: Killer Octave Question > No! It makes no sense! I leave it to you to build a > bridge that is kerfed on the underside, bent to fit > the board and then filled with epoxy! > Thump! > > --- Farrell <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > I've done some playin' and some tinkin'. And I've > > decided that there is a difference between a crowned > > bridge, but that the difference, in practical terms, > > is negligent. > > > > If you cut a circle out of cardboard one foot in > > diameter, and then cut a circle out of the middle of > > that, let's say eight inches in diameter, you have a > > big flat donut. Set that donut on a basketball so > > that it sets like a topless hat. Now also realize > > that you need about a foot of tangent coming off the > > donut at some point (low tenor or long bridge). Now > > you can see the argument for a crowned bridge. Or > > perhaps not really just a crowned bridge, but a > > bridge that has a bottom bevel in the treble area > > and a crown in the lower tenor. > > > > Now back to reality. Soundboards, even Fandrich > > soundboards, have a larger crown radius than a > > basketball, and a bridge is only 32 or 35 mm wide. > > So I do suppose that the ribbed soundboard panel and > > bridge itself will conform quite readily to the very > > slightly mis-matched straight bridge and curved > > soundboard panel. The tenor end will bend enough > > (what, maybe 1 mm) and the treble section of the > > bridge can have a top whose plane is not quite > > parallel to the plane of the bridge bottom/panel top > > interface. Bottom line: any difference is close to > > or wholly within common woodworking error and > > completely negated by the flexibility of the woods. > > > > That make sense? > > > > Terry Farrell > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ron Nossaman" <RNossaman@cox.net> > > To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> > > Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 12:02 AM > > Subject: Re: Killer Octave Question > > > > > > > > > > >FWIW: I just cut a long bridge out of an old > > Mason & Hamlin and it is as > > > >flat as a pancake. Not a speck of crown to be > > found. > > > > > > > >Terry Farrell > > > > > > You can tell? How tragic. One of the points I try > > to illustrate in my > > > bridge building class is the difficulty in > > determining whether or not the > > > original bridge was crowned, and how important it > > is to the assembly. An > > > old Knabe bridge, lying on a table and propped up > > in the middle with a > > > pencil, shows a lovely crown from end to end. Pull > > the pencil out, and it's > > > dead flat. That bridge will lay on a crowned > > soundboard and very nicely > > > conform to the crown of the board. > > > > > > Ron N > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > pianotech list info: > > https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > > _______________________________________________ > > pianotech list info: > https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more > http://tax.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC