>I just got finished realizing that any crown in a ribbed board is >incidental, and not required for support of the string load. Then you realized incompletely. Crown along the ribs is a rather necessary part of current soundboard design. >This meant that the underside of the bridge didn't need to be fitted to >match board curvature (crown) parallel to the board and bridge. What >remains is any extent to which the bridge may, in its path down the board, >cross the "continental divide" (as 'twere), and thus need to have its >bottom shaped to match this uphill/downhill contour. If this isn't done, I >could imagine that the flat-bottom (for lack of a shorter word) bridge >would would end up twisted in its cross section. Then the bridge would no >longer be plumb to the string plane, but rather to the whatever point in >the board's curvature you chose to measure it. You're assessing all this from the pathological example of your bridge sample. Go through it again with the picture of the bridge I sent, and it will make more sense. >Maybe I pulled this thinking out of the oven too soon, maybe I should put >it back in. Yes, or rather, start over. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC