Kimball Whitney

[Avery Todd]

For some reason, I just FEEL this post coming!! :-)

Avery

At 02:07 PM 01/05/03 -0500, you wrote:
>In a message dated 1/5/03 12:36:31 PM Central Standard Time, 
>tomtuner@attbi.com writes:
>
>
>>List,
>>     Not to open a can of worms here, and I preface my comment by
>>telling you I'm not a "digital keyboard" ,guy but even a low cost
>>digital would be more productive for a beginner than a Whitney that is
>>difficult to tune, has horrid stability problems , awful tone and an
>>action that has poor performance at best. If there is a reason why
>>Kimball is gone the Whitney may give a clue.Just my opinion .
>>     Tom Driscoll RPT
>
>
>Funny, I never had any of these problems.  Kimball is still in business 
>and making a profit.  The Whitney piano will last longer than all of those 
>on here who have condemned it.  If it were in my area, I'd treat it just 
>as I would any other piano.  I might charge more for servicing than was 
>paid for the piano but that's how I make my living, piano service, not 
>trashing virtually every piano ever made.
>
>Bill Bremmer RPT
>Madison, Wisconsin
><http://www.billbremmer.com/>Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b r e m m e r . 
>c o m =-