---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 6/1/2003 7:01:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, davidlovepianos@earthlink.net writes: > My guess is that the knuckle position is 16mm and it should be 17 mm. Unless they've been changed, a 1999 piano should have 17mm knuckles already. David S has offered to graph things, which would be lovely, but just from the numbers Mark gives, I would say a change in leading is out, and the choices to bring the balance weight down are between lightening the hammers a little, and moving the capstans, unless I'm wrong about the knuckles. In the piano's present location, I would lean toward filing. True, they aren't super heavy, but neither are they criminally light. I would be interested to know how the piano regulated, i. e., how much dip was required (assuming 1.75" blow). I would take a look at the action spread (not expecting a problem), and I would look to see where the capstans hit the repetitions. These are all pretty quick. Bob D ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/10/7c/eb/69/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC