This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment ----- Original Message -----=20 From: St=E9phane Collin=20 To: Pianotech=20 Sent: June 07, 2003 7:49 AM Subject: Re: Hammer assist spring ? Hello Ric. But if indeed there is not a repetition performance comparable to = that of a modern action (which, as Stephen Birkett noted, is seldom = really needed in piano litterature), I can tell you that the gain in = feel for control, especially at low levels, is tremendous. No buffers = between your finger and the hammer, and you really can regulate set-off = at less than 1 mm from the strings without any problem. I wouldn't want = another action in my own piano. This is the part that intrigues me. The ability to set very close letoff = and the ability to control the action at pianissimo levels.=20 This, to me, is the greatest limitation of the so-called "modern" grand = action. I had not really given it much thought until we started building = the Fandrich 122 Vertical. Using Darrell Fandrich's vertical action = design gave this piano such control at pianissimo levels it became one = of the most notable features visiting pianists were attracted to. The modern grand action doesn't come close to this level of control. Del ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/e2/de/45/49/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC