Samick string breaker

David M. Porritt dm.porritt@verizon.net
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 20:22:41 -0500


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
David:

With a hard player, string breakage is inevitable.  If it originally
went 4 years without string breakage, I'd really recommend
restringing the top two sections.  I have some major string breakers
here at SMU and that's the only thing that helps.  All but one of our
practice room grands are Steinway "Ls" and "Ms".  It's not the size,
it's the force of the playing.  The strings pass their elastic limit
too many times there at the capo bar and the cumulative effect is
broken strings.

dave
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 6/9/2003 at 7:48 PM David V. Anderson wrote:
I=92ve got a Wurlitzer C-143 (Samick) about 6 years old, which has
become a habitual string breaker.  I=92m going out at the end of the
week.  Since I haven=92t seen this piano for months, I can=92t
remember the capo/agraffe configuration, but it seems to me that all
the breakage is in octaves  5-7.  Not confined to a particular wire
size.  The capo shape doesn=92t seem particularly aggressive.  The
breaks occur on long enough strings to rule out a misplaced plate, I
believe.(I haven=92t taken measurements yet)  I have only seen the
piano over the last year, but this apparently started about four
years into service.  I know the condition of the hammers was allowed
to deteriorate before I first saw the instrument.  Private home, hard
player.  I suspect that the simple combination of a heavy player on a
small instrument with =BC=94+ of hammer contact is the cause, and
that even though the hammer shape has been corrected and is being
maintained, the damage has already been done.  Is there a
brand-specific issue here, or something else I=92m missing?  I feel a
musician would be better served with a larger piano for a variety of
other reasons, but is there a correlation between a smaller
instrument and accelerated wear?  He=92ll be making a decision
between simply giving restringing the upper sections a try or
upgrading the piano.  I=92d like some input to back my
recommendation.

David V. Anderson, RPT
Milwaukee

**************** END MESSAGE FROM David V. Anderson
********************* 
_____________________________
David M. Porritt
dporritt@mail.smu.edu
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275
_____________________________


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/96/b9/51/71/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC