>Ok.. correct me if / where I am wrong then Ron > >In the example you give, the magnet uses an assumed 20 grams force for >illustration purposes. You describe how that pans out in terms of its net >effect >on the key front by adjusting this number by the ratio of the keyfront/magnet >ratio divided by the keyfront/capstan ratio, AND by also adjusting this >number by >the ratio of this second class lever which is the distance of the whippen >center >to the center of the whippen magnet divided by the distance of the whippen >center >to the center of the capstan. In both cases the results are added to the >capstan >which are then adjusted again by the key ratio to arrive at the net DW at the >front >of the key. > >An attempt at an ascci whippen and key to illustrate.... > >WC...........Cap.........WMag > Cap.........KMag........BR.........KFront. > > >20 grams x ((KMag,BW / KFront,BW) / (Cap,BW / KFront,BW)) yields the >magnets lift >applied directly to the key > >and > >20 grams x (WC,WMag / WC,Cap) yeilds the net lift on the casptan by the magnet >force upwards at the whippen magnet. This is a negative number because we are >lightening the load on the capstan. Unless I missed something, yes. >Since both of these quantities are applied at the capstan... the net >result felt >at the finger has to be adjusted by the ratio of the key at the capstan. > >A very neat way of viewing all net effects of this extra <<virtual capstan>> >through the eyes of the real capstan and corresponding key ratio. It's the simplest approach I came up with.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC