<< R Moody asks back.... Ed,,,,, If Emanuel Ax, ,, PLUS a professor at Vanderbilt can't tell the difference between ET and what you tuned, why should we (tuners) be concerned with tuning something other than ET?? >> Hmm, I would phrase it another way, ie, Why should we tuners be concerned with exactness of tuning ET, at all? But that is to miss the exciting part, which is, 'what can the tuner do to improve the art'? To a hummingbird that sees the infra-red spectrum, the world is a very differently colored place. The pianists didn't "see" the difference because they were not looking for it! I have seen this occur in numerous situations. When I tell pianists that there are two different tunings on side by side pianos, and ask them to just tell me which sounds better, 99.9% of them have chosen the Broadwood. However, if nothing is said, less than half will detect a difference. What accounts for this? I think it is because THEY ARE NOT LISTENING to the actual sound. They are not sensitized to the effects. They are hearing "elsewhere". When the traditional order of ascending dissonance is in place, music composed in the WT era creates a natural "fit" and the lack of ET doesn't become a problem. However, if you put a temperament on there with the "colors" in all the wrong places, they sure as the dickens sense something is amiss,(I found this out with the DeMorgan). I blame this on 100 years of not having a choice, on a century spent without key color. Today's pianists are unaware of the out of tuneness that makes ET so special. They have become inured to the ever-present haze that all those identical thirds hide behind. Once sensitized to the contrasts in a WT, it is amazing to them that they ever thought ET sounded good. They often wonder, "How did I ever like that sound!" I believe this ignorance in the piano world offers a golden opportunity to today's technicians that want to invest some time and effort. It is an opportunity to deliver epiphanies to pianists. It is an opportunity to increase the emotional value of the music and to increase the attraction in the piano, itself. This can't be bad for our trade, can it? With all the competition for attention in the musical world today, anything that can help the piano be attractive helps us,too. Putting a Valotti or Young on a spinet might make the difference in a childs desire to pursue it. Might not, but it sure doesn't hurt. The techniques required are relatively simple, and with more than a few years of trial and error, I believe I can offer a safe approach to introducing pianist to the world of temperaments. It has never been my goal to "invent" new temperaments, nor to prove anybody wrong in what they do, but rather, to offer a way of using the research to improve what we do. I guess I would like to help tune the tuner's art. Those that find solace and comfort in the status quo will not care for this. Convincing tuners to change their methods has proven to be an incredibly difficult task, (which makes me REAL suspicious of those that would suggest the trade rapidly adopted ET in 1830! Tuners don't make changes that fast today. I don't think those of yore would be more progressive, especially in light of how long the traditions had been in place, how tonally dependant the music was at the time, and how slow communication might have been without TV, telephones, internet, or widespread published information. ) I will be bringing the class "Temperaments for the 21st Century" back at the Dallas convention. It is listed as for all levels of tech, and everybody is welcome to invest 90 minutes in giving new perspectives a shot. Regards, Ed Foote RPT www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/ www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC