Judge-and-jury

[Wimblees@aol.com]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 3/14/03 6:47:06 AM Central Standard Time, 
pryan2@the-beach.net writes:

> They gave him a chance
> to come back and fix them, he did, but the pianos are still unacceptable to
> them.  They told me they are happy with the way I tune, and if I say they
> are "mal-tuned,"  they will not pay this other tech.
> 
> I want the gig, but not the judge-and-jury part.  Should I accept the job?
> Defend or condemn the other tech?  Should someone get paid for unacceptable
> work?
> 
> Phil Ryan
> 
> 

Kind of like going to doctor for a second opinion. If the second doctor 
recommends bed rest, instead of surgery, which is what the first doctor 
ordered, would they not pay the first doctor for an office visit? 

The first tech did what he was supposed to do. It might have been what they 
wanted, but he did the job. It is not your job to approve or condemn his 
work. They owe both of you for the work performed. 

Wim 

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/08/12/1a/45/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--