This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment I agree with Richard in that it is a matter of feel. The jack must = travel enough to escape the knuckle and have a feel of completeness to = the stroke with no excess motion.=20 0.50 to 0.60 from the point of letoff is about right. Set a sample note = and check to see that the jack is ending up where it is supposed to. The = problem is to make all the notes the same. Blow distance changes = aftertouch so make sure the blow distance is set on every string. Then I = take a piece of hard plastic, 0.50 thick, the size of a keytop head, = with a slot the width of a key pin notched in one end and slide that = under the felt punching. What ever you use, a penny maybe, it has to be = thin enough to have let off occur, then from your sample note, determine = how far past let off the key is now traveling and adjust the key dip to = match the sample. A piano with 0.60 aftertouch, the hammer will drop and = rise ever so slightly as the punchings firm up. No rise, remove some = punchings, etc.=20 The same plastic, in the shape of a keytop tail, slides in-between the = white key pins to do the sharps in the same manner. This is a method = that produces a very even aftertouch, sharps included. Note to Bob Davis. Thanks for this method. It was a piece to the jigsaw = puzzle that sat there for awhile before it fit into the picture. Knowing = that you consider some of the methods you have developed to be = proprietary, I apologize if I crossed that boundary, but hey, these guys = need all the help they can get. <GRIN> I gave enough hints, they might = be able to figure out what keytop material is already .050. As you so = eloquently posted, sharing information and techniques improves the = overall quality of piano work around the world and comes back to us in = form of respect for our profession and earning power. I must compliment = you on your class at the CA convention, well put together and "the most = applause at the end of the class" award. Keith Roberts ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bob Hull=20 To: pianotech@ptg.org=20 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:49 PM Subject: Aftertouch evaluation I am wondering about the value of different methods of evaluating = aftertouch on a grand. I know one method is to add punchings on top of = those on the front rail pin until let-off can't take place;=20 Another method I've heard of and used is to look at the final position = of the jack in relationship to the knuckle and jack cushion after drop - = but this can't be done with the action in the piano; The next method = (which I don't think I've read about anywhere) is my question to the = list: Can you accurately evaluate aftertouch by traveling the = key/hammer through drop and then moving the jack tender downward to see = how far the jack travels before being stopped by the jack cushion? Also, if you are using the addition of punchings on the front rail pin = until let-off fails, what are some good parameters to stay within for = "good" aftertouch, i.e. .050 - .060 ? I know the Steinway manual says = that a good amount is about the thickness of a new penny. How far can = we stray from that measurement and still be alright? Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a1/84/68/86/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC