Horowitz and Mohr

Bill Ballard yardbird@vermontel.net
Fri, 9 May 2003 06:38:55 -0400


At 9:16 AM +0200 5/9/03, Richard Brekne wrote:
>What I never understood was what gave Steinway the right to reclaim the
>thing and wreck it in the first place ? Was it THEIR piano or was it
>Horowitz's ? Did they buy it back ? Was it given to them ? What was the
>deal ?

The D at his house was a gift to him from the factory. The ones he 
toured with belonged to C&A. Rudolf Serkin always had one D (and then 
two, after he remodeled his barn for studio space in the early 70's). 
None of these pianos ever belonged to him, they were loaned by the 
factory.

>From a purely historical
>point of view, they should have maintained the instrument in exactly the
>manner Horowitz himself prefered it, or they should at least drop any
>pretenses of this instrument representing Horwowitz and his music.

Shameful bait and switch.

Bill Ballard RPT
NH Chapter, P.T.G.

"So come on down, for the best in fidelity"
     ...........AM radio spot for the local Radio Shack store.
(Thank you, I'll take a space between the last two words.)
+++++++++++++++++++++

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC