Rick, It's a matter of degree. You should lower the pitch / tension enough so that the piano will not go above A440 when you pull the gap together. How much you drop pitch depends on how much the pinblock has spread. Dropping tension completely, so that coil tightness and string spacing have to be re-established, is a waste of time. Also, if you use epoxy to fill the crack, it can fill the holes behind the pins, so that when you try to bring the piano up to pitch the pins bottom out on the epoxy after about a quarter turn. DAMHIK. Mike > [Original Message] > From: <richard.ucci@att.net> > To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org> > Date: 10/3/2003 7:53:18 AM > Subject: Re: Pinblock Separation Questions > > What if the piano is already a full tone down? Does the tension still need to > be lowered? > > Rick Ucci/Ucci Piano > > In a message dated 10/2/2003 2:18:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > > mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com writes: > > > > > I just looked at a late 1980s Baldwin studio, serial #1417324, style #4023 > > > (model number?), with a pinblock separating from the back assembly (about a > > > quarter-inch separation). The piano has 3 backposts, but the back assembly is > > > covered with veneers. Does anyone know if the backposts on these pianos > > > extend to the top of the back assembly (top of back assembly also covered with > > > veneers - yes, I will be able to tell when I yank these veneers off - but was > > > curious before I get into it). Any knowledge of this Del? The three top plate > > > screws are centered over the three post centerlines, so I suspect they may > > > extend up to the top. > > > > > > The couple times I have done this repair has been with older instruments > > > where the backposts did extent to the top - and of course I through-bolted > > > through them. If, by chance, this is a piano - like some Kimballs - where the > > > > backposts terminate at the base of the top back assembly (about at the > > pinblock > > > bottom), has anyone done this type of repair on that design? I see no evidence > > > that the rear portion of the upper back assembly has moved - appears that > > > only the pinblock has moved, so I suppose it would be just fine to epoxy and > > > through-bolt to the back of this design. Anyone aware of any pitfalls I might > > > not be seeing here? > > > > > > Also, any non-bionic technician willing to share how many hours they have > > > taken to do a repair like this - start to finish, not including pitch > > > adjustments and tuning (just clamping, drilling, bonding, bolting and > > cleanup)? > > > > > > > I've done many pianos like this. Mostly they've not been Baldwins, however I > > just finished my 4th Baldwin in 4 months. I figure about 4-5 hours total. I > > usually take around 1-2 hours to loosen the tension, glue, clamp and bolt the > > thing back together. The second day is typically something from 2-3 hours to > > bring back the tension, tighten up the coils, and properly space the strings. > > The > > last one I did was a spinet with the veneer on the top. Since the veneer was > > not cooperative in coming off, I found a sheet of brown name-board felt to > > cover the top. Saved a lot of time messing around with matching veneer! > > > > Good luck!! > > > > will wickham > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC