> -----Original Message----- > From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]On > Behalf Of Richard Brekne > Sent: February 04, 2004 9:47 AM > To: Pianotech > Subject: Re: Soundboard stiffening > > > > The more I hear this "the ribs are doing nothing but trying to > straighten out the panel" the less it makes sense. Ok so the ribs are > bent as part of the crowning process... so is the panel.. but nobody > talks about the panel trying to staighten out ribs... yet you could just > as well turn the whole "lets blame the panels expansion" argumentation > on the ribs. Now, wait a minute here. Who said "the ribs are doing nothing but trying to straighten out the panel."? With or without crown, and regardless of how crown is obtained, the ribs are going to add stiffness to the assembly. That does not preclude their resisting being bent in the compression-crowned soundboard assembly. No one talks about "the panel trying to straighten out the ribs" because it doesn't work that way. Have you ever handled an edge-glued spruce panel? Sure you have. Just how much straightening is that thing going to do? > > I would suggest that the ribs are not bent simply because the panel is > taking on moisture... but because they are made to resist any panel > expansion at the interface between ribs and panel. It seems only half a > truth and one that easily leads to less then half truths to simply say > the ribs are bent by the panel, and do nothing more then resist crown. I think you're getting the idea. In the compression-crowned soundboard assembly, the ribs are indeed bent because of the stress interface between them -- they really don't like to stretch along their grain -- and the expanding soundboard panel. (At least the panel would be expanding if it were not constrained by the ribs glued to it.) And the panel is expanding because it is taking on moisture. That is how a compression-crowned soundboard assembly works. Again, who said the ribs do "nothing more than resist crown?" > > No doubt the bend in both panel and rib seen as isolated component > forces will exert a force that works against crown. Funny how tho the > net effect is plenty of crown and plenty strength. Yes, it is, isn't it? Until, of course, either the glue joint fails or compression set within the panel reduces the stress interface between the panel and the ribs to the point the system is no longer able to support crown. > > Also.... this thread has hinted at a difference between the CC panel and > RC panel yet to be brought to light... one that has quite probably > significant performance ramifications. This matter of increased > stiffness when downbearing is applied to the one, vs constant stiffness > for the other. It remains to be seen whether the effect holds true for both types. Until I actually try it I'll hold my further comment. It also remains to be seen just how much affect this characteristic may or may not have on the two different types of soundboard configurations. Del
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC