S&S replacing Hammer Assemblies with new

Erwinspiano@aol.com Erwinspiano@aol.com
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:21:11 EST


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
        Andre=20
   I agree with the reasoning of what youre' saying but The Ronsen hammer on=
=20
mahogony moldings can be tapered,arced & coved to be esentially the same=20
weight as the original Steinway hammers. I've done it many times & the sound=
 is=20
good.
     In fact Ray Negron at Ronsen said recently that John Patton of Steinway=
=20
said that Ray's hammers are as close to the originals as any thing made toda=
y=20
both in weight & density. Quite a compliment. I use primarily his hammer tha=
t=20
uses the felt he buys from Abel.
   Regard--Dale
Yes but the immediate problem you get is when you replace the original=20
hammers as well, because in this case the weight of the hammers is very=20
crucial.
It means getting a new hammer that weighs exactly as much as the=20
original.
There is no hammer maker who produces exactly that hammer, so you have=20
to modify a new set of hammers and you have to almost ruin that new set=20
of hammers to get back to the original weight.
I have seen many attempts to do so and they all looked ridiculous, the=20
tails were still too long and in the end they were still too heavy=20
anyway because the materials used nowadays are different and weigh more=20
than the original hammers of which for instance the original felt was=20
much less dense than VFG felt Abel uses.
More lead in the keys will complete the usual and well known=20
catastrophe.

My 2 Euro cents

Andr=E9 Oorebeek

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/70/74/4c/68/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC