Who REALLY won the election ???? ( OT)

[marc avery]

Larry,

None of your comments have anything to do with the true essence of what I'm 
trying to say.
And besides...  CBS didn't try to "pull anything". They're owned by one of 
the cheapest cost cutting broadcasting corporations around.  Their CEO and 
board of directors are about as right wing as you can get.  Whitewater a 
scandal?  Give me a break.  Enron was a scandal.  Ask anyone who worked 
there and lost everything.  Can you honestly say the same for Whitewater?
Believe me, if the twin towers hadn't been attacked, Bush would have never 
got off his butt either.
He ignored all the CIA information about a possible attack.  Plus, wasn't it 
Bush who said in the 2000 debates that he would NEVER commit our troups for 
nation building purposes of any kind?

How is your sigmoid colon looking today?


>From: LarryinAtlanta@aol.com
>Reply-To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org>
>To: pianotech@ptg.org
>Subject: Re: Who REALLY won the election ???? ( OT)
>Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:44:21 EST
>
>In a message dated 11/8/2004 8:31:53 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>marc_avery@hotmail.com writes:
>First of all it wasn't a "landslide victory".  Fifty-one percent of the
>popular vote was cast by an estimated 60% of the total eligible voters.
>This means that Bush received backing from about 31% of all elibible U.S.
>voters.  That my friend is hardly a "landslide".
>Excuse me, but the final total was 52%. In addition, Bush won by more than 
>5
>million in the popular vote. Republicans added 4 seats to the house and
>senate. Tom Daschle was sent packing. And of the 11 states that had it on 
>the
>ballot, all 11 soundly rejected the idea of same sex marriage.
>
>
>Secondly, I am so sick of
>every right wing zombie always falling back to the same old message of "the
>left wing media".
>You may be sick of it, but that doesn't change the facts. Unless you've 
>been
>living in a cave, you should be aware of the stunts Dan Rather and CBS 
>tried
>to pull.
>
>Almost every day during the Clinton adlministration we
>had to hear about the great "Whitewater scandal".
>You should have. It was a scandal.
>
>I actually work for one of those left wing media operations that you speak
>about.  Let me tell you this buddy, those networks are huge corporations.
>Huge corporations that benefit from administrations like Bush's.  Didn't
>Bush just sign a new tax cut for corporations?  Oh, and here's your next
>comment I'm sure.....  "Well corporations hire people, so with the new tax
>cut they will be able to hire more people".   YEA RIGHT!
>And it is this kind of logic that helped assure your party's implosion.
>
>And lastly some food for thought.  Take a look at a graph of the national
>deficit from the beginning of the Clinton administration (1992) through
>today.  If you were on the board of directors of a major company and took a
>look at those numbers (because numbers are the ONLY concern of the modern
>corporation), who would YOU select for your next CEO?
>Well, Clinton's graph wouldn't have looked so good if he had actually 
>gotten
>off his butt and done something about the terrorist attacks we suffered 
>while
>HE was in office, huh? Or have you forgotten how many times we were 
>attacked
>by terrorists while Bubba was getting Lewinskis?
>
>
>"And as for"liberalism being dead politically".  I believe liberalism was
>voted FOR by 48% of those Americans who voted."
>
>No, about half of them did. The other half voted against Bush. Wake up and
>pay attention. The survival of your party now depends on it. Because we 
>need a
>two party system, it is important to me that *someone* on your side of the
>fence pull your head out of your butts and smell the coffee.

_________________________________________________________________
Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to 
School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx