---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment On 12-nov-04, at 8:26, Dave Nereson wrote: > Isn't 1000 grit about as abrasive as, say, newsprint? I'll admit=20 > that > most of the hammers I've filed are on old pianos whose hammers have=20 > never > been filed since they were built, and the string cuts are an eighth of=20= > an > inch deep or more. Sometimes I'll re-file a job someone else botched.=20= > I > seldom have a chance to do voicing on really nice grands. But even=20 > there, > I've never used finer than 120 grit. Using finer seems like going=20 > past the > point of diminishing returns. Does going up past 320 or so really=20 > make that > much difference? It makes a difference when you work with new hammers. Look at hammers maybe in a new way : A unison should be straight and level, the hammer striking surface=20 should be level with the unison. Now look very closely at the surface of newly filed hammers... Are they=20= really smooth? Look at the hammer surfaces as if you used a magnifying glass... Do you see hills? do you see rocks? do you see irregularities? If you really want to take care of those hammer surfaces, you need to=20 polish them down to a polder landscape. Ever been to Holland? You get bored with the landscape within 5 minutes. You know why? it is=20= a polder landscape : there are no hills, no mountains, it is just flat=20= as a well sanded hammer. For a hammer it makes all the difference.. for human beings, I would=20 say : take a vacation to Hawaii. friendly greetings from Andr=E9 Oorebeek "where Music is, no harm can be" ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1568 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/45/72/c7/3c/attachment.bin ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC