David Ilvedson wrote: >Certainly a variety of pianos/actions is a good thing but that's far from a poor quality piano.... > >David Ilvedson > > > > Yes, and that is exactly the core issue here me thinks. <<Critical thinking>>, if first we are to start waving flags as it were, should point to that in the first place I would suggest,. Hopping on an already polarized wagon is something entirely different.. To begin with... Mathew never got a chance to clarify what he meant by <<poor piano>>... at least not clearly... nobody really gave him a chance. Secondly... the truely <<poor piano>> side of the question is simply not interesting to discuss... tho perhaps entertaining from a food fight perspective if you get my meaning :). However, the direction the discussion has been taken by several folks along the lines of the wide variety of action configurations in more or less acceptable condition points to a very interesting discussion indeed. Lots of great stuff there, and I look forward to the continuance. Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC