> And yes, I'm guilty of a bit of sarcasm here, but you've also slaughtered > the findings from my field of study to sell your product. I'm not trying to > pick on you, but merely trying to illustrate a point. You've bent over > backwards to snow everyone with techno-speak. However, what will really > sell your method, in my opinion, is a more basic and earnest discussion that > everyone can understand -- a discussion that doesn't invoke Einstein's > theory of relativity or Maxwell's equations. If you're invoking Planck's > constant or Avagadro's number in the discussion, you're probably not > discussing the right things. > > All constructive criticism, I hope... > > Peace, > Sarah Don't forget Heisenberg. Quite without certainty, physicist Heisenberg Asked for a ruling, most times, would demure Such ambiguity clouded his thinking that Now, when he thinks he's confused, he's not sure!
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC