I'd like to add my slant to this discussion. Repeatedly, time and time again, I've corrected regulation problems (insufficient after touch) by decreasing the angle of the capstan without altering KR. Let me reiterate again how I establish the capstan's attitude. Mark the edge of the wippen cushion at the magic line and draw a line through that mark perpendicular to the cushion onto the key side (action blocked at half-blow). A capstan installed at that angle will have the angles at rest and full dip to be quasi equal and opposite, moving through perpendicular. One way to lock the action at half-blow is to prop a tri-square (with a spring clamp) set to the appropriate height to block the hammer and place a weight on the front of the key. Another way is to shim underneath the weighted key front. Many times an acute capstan angle will not move the wippen through sufficient distance to achieve adequate after touch. These 16+ degree angles when decreased to ~3 degrees without altering KR can produce a system which causes the action to function properly without having to compromise hammer blow or key dip. Once or twice it meant a slightly forwards facing capstan. It could be too that it's the face of the capstan, which is now more in contact with the cushion, imparts lift across a broader surface (closer to the wippen center). Once the angle has been established, the position of the capstan can be moved fore and aft slightly to fine tune after touch. For any given set of key dip, hammer bore/blow, knuckle radius there is an optimum KR which causes the wippen to move through sufficient distance for the jack to clear the knuckle. Too much KR and you'll be decreasing dip and/or decreasing hammer blow, too little KR and you'll be increasing dip and/or increasing hammer blow. The Goldilocks Principle. Regards, Jon Page
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC