thanks for your suggestions. for now, i'm trying to make something like Yamaha PT-100II without the partial display or analyzer (i assume). and i'm looking for the stretch offset tables that the user can use as reference. katsura On Apr 23, 2005, at 5:29 PM, DKnabe wrote: > Katsura-san, > > The problem you are facing is that each piano is unique. Yes, you can > put in approximate stretch values for typical grands or even specific > models of a particular manufacturer. When you do that, and IF the > person doing the tuning is able to match your pitch for each note, > they will still not have an expert tuning. > > Here's the secret. Each string creates a set of partials when struck. > These partials are not integer multiples of the fundamental. In > general, each higher partial is slightly sharper than the previous > partial. The secret to good sounding tunings is to maximize the > matches between all the important partials of each string to all the > other strings within the constraints of somewhat equal temperament > (12th root of 2). So, to match an expert piano technician, your tuning > program should measure each partial of each string, and then do a best > fit of the most important partials (loudest, etc) so that the piano > sounds as smooth as you can get it. This is what aural tuners do, and > that is also what the best electronic tuners strive to do. > > To see how others have solved this problem, go to their web sites. See > www.veritune.com/, or http://www.tunelab-world.com/ or > http://www.accu-tuner.com/. There are other professional electronic > tuners out there as well. > > My recommendation is that if you are really serious about making a > professional tuning program, you should join the Piano Technicians > Guild and learn about the instrument. You can take tuning classes at > many local, regional and national conventions. The National convention > is June 15-19 in Kansas City. > > Good luck, > Doug Knabe > Dallas > > Hidetomo Katsura wrote: > >> thanks. i forgot to mention that i knew about the stretch tables on >> the Peterson 490ST manual and three piano model specific stretch >> tables at precisionstrobe.com (fyi, i did use google). >> >> i'm looking for something more specific to each piano manufacturer >> and model (like the ones at precisionstrobe.com). >> >> katsura >> >> On Apr 23, 2005, at 2:35 PM, Benny L. Tucker wrote: >> >>> This pdf manual for a Peterson Strobe Tuner is available for >>> download at the >>> link below. It lists the offsets for the fundamental frequencies for >>> several >>> different piano styles. I use this tuner myself to intonate guitars >>> with. >>> You may have to copy and paste the link into your browser if it gets >>> chopped >>> up in the email. >>> Hope this helps. >>> >>> http://www.petersontuners.com/support/pdfmanuals/PDF%20Manuals/ >>> Strobe%20Tune >>> rs%20-%20True%20Mechanical/AutoStrobe/AutoStrobe%20490ST/ >>> 490stenglish.pdf >>> >>> Benny L. Tucker >>> Yamaha Factory Tuner >>> Precision Piano Tuning & Repair >>> Thomaston, Ga. >>> >>> >>> i see. it's my own ETD i developed based on the popular requests from >>> my Strobe Tuner users. >>> >>> Piano Tuner 1.0 for Mac OS X >>> >>> http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/26163 >>> >>> my stretch offset table data format is just a text file with note >>> names >>> and offsets and looks like this: >>> >>> "A0"="-20.000"; >>> "Bb0"="-19.000"; >>> "B0"="-18.000"; >>> "C1"="-17.000"; >>> "C#1"="-16.000"; >>> "D1"="-15.000"; >>> >>> katsura >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >> > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC