Hey, Michael, what century you livin' in, Dude???? www.pitchlock.com Alan Barnard Smilin' Friendly-Like in Salem, Missouri > [Original Message] > From: Michael Gamble <michael@gambles.fsnet.co.uk> > To: Andrew & Rebeca Anderson <anrebe@laredo.globalpc.net>; <pianotech@ptg.org> > Date: 06/21/2005 4:46:39 PM > Subject: Re: Pitchlock > > Hello Andrew - any chance of a piccy? > Michael of Sussex (UK) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew & Rebeca Anderson" <anrebe@laredo.globalpc.net> > To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 4:40 PM > Subject: Re: Pitchlock > > > > The pitch-lock devise is a 'staple' for lack of a better description that > > grips two adjacent strings and couples their harmonic motion. This > > coupling does come at a price. The highest partials & noise is muted. > > That is why you only couple the two worst strings of a noisy three string > > unison. You couple out the out-of-phase noises and keep one loose for > > "life" in the sound. > > Bass strings lose a lot of their "airiness" when coupled. Balanced > > against very noisy strings in, say, a chinese piano this may be a good > > choice. It is not something I'd consider first in a performance venue > > instrument. But to tame a noisy customer piano that is hard to tune and > > doesn't respond to termination work, why not? > > The device's inventor was clear that this solution is not for all pianos > > and for all situations. Try out and use judiciously. I can think of a > > Pramberger upright that will get these on some noisy bass strings, also a > > Yamaha C7 with several screaming front duplexes (yes the capo should be > > re-milled, try getting that through a committee). You can use these to > > couple all three duplexes and then tune them to a desired partial by > > sliding them to or away from the center of the duplex. Quite cool > > actually. > > > > Andrew > > > > At 02:05 PM 6/20/2005, you wrote: > >>Hello List and Paul C. > >>For those able to attend that class this must have been a day of > >>Revelations. (Not religion!) But for those unable to attend I wonder what > >>a "Pitchlock" is? Is it something like the "Wolf Arrester" I have on my > >>'cello "C" string? > >>Regards > >>Michael G.(UK) > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: <mailto:tune4@earthlink.net>Paul Chick (Earthlink) > >>To: <mailto:pianotech@ptg.org>'Pianotech' > >>Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:09 PM > >>Subject: RE: Pitchlock > >> > >> > >>Subject: Pitchlock > >> > >>Has anyone had experience with the pitchlock devices. It sounds like > >>something that would help with some wild bass strings, and maybe even some > >>false beating treble strings. However the startup cost is pretty hefty. > >>Not bad if it does what it says, but I thought I might inquire from the > >>list first. > >>Any thoughts?? > >> > >>Ed Carwithen > >>John Day, OR > >> > >>Ed > >>The class on Pitchlock at the K C Institute demonstrated their use. > >>Attendees listened to the "before" and the "after" in the speaking > >>lengths, front and rear duplex. They work as claimed. > >> > >>Paul C > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC