> The evaporation from a small standing jar of water might be a quart > in a season. I must agree that a damp-chaser would be better, but for someone without any money, they do whatever is best compared to doing nothing. I keep thinking there has to be a way to wick the water out faster. Every time I come up with another idea, it is an improvement, but still not as good as I would like. My next idea is to heat the water...? I have a submersible heater for a fish tank & am using that to see what happens. The problem with this is that, if it works, we are now getting into more money again. I'll let you know if it works, anyway. ;) If someone has money, I always recommend the damp-chaser because it works and is consistent. If someone doesn't have money, I just keep trying to come up with new ideas, or see what ideas they can come up with. ;) Humidifying the room is always a good idea, if it's not too big of a room. ...frustrated in WV, mags > The evaporation from a room humidifier can be a quart in one night > I fill my Dampp Chaser humidifier at least once a week with over a > quart of water . > The jars of water have an effect so minimal as to be unmeasurable. > Some little old ladies in my practice insist on doing this because > old dead Mr. Tuneman told them it was a good idea, > but I personally would chuck those jars. > Best wishes, > > Tom Driscoll RPT >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC