That should read about 5/8" flex in the tail. David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of David Love Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 1:44 PM To: 'Pianotech' Subject: Plate Flexing While taking off the plate bolts of a Steinway L (c1961) I noticed the plate coming up at the tail. The photo shows a stretched string between the agraffe and hitch at note 27 after removal of the bolts--no movement in the treble, btw. Before removing the plate bolts, the bearing measured plus 1o at this point. Total amount of flex in the tail was about .75". Interesting in that the bridge is fairly uniform height and the plate is level along the stretcher. If I were to recap the bridge to accommodate the plate in a neutral position, there would be a 14 mm difference between the height of the bridge at not 27 and note 88. While the plate clearly has sat this way for a long time, I'm not real crazy about bending it that much again. Plate flexing on Steinways is common but I've always wondered what the upper limit is. This seems a bit excessive. This piano will not get a new soundboard (unfortunately) but that wouldn't really solve the problem anyway. It seems that the plate is warped. The string height does dip somewhat at the top of the treble (typical) and since I'm putting in a new block my thought is to raise that side of the plate a bit which would rock the plate down a bit in the back (though not much), recap the bridges (all of them will need to be done) to allow a lesser amount of flexing at the tail. Any other suggestions or comments would be welcome. David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC