> I don't think it always true that the older the better. I believe that > the first pianos coming out of Steinway were designs in progress, and the > really great pianos happened after they had finished their learning curve. So they stopped learning when? About 1880? Sorry...... Terry Farrell > Ah yes, we can learn a lot. Specifically, how not to make a piano. That > is what the Steinways did between 1853 and around 1880. There are a lot > of > things in these pianos that the makers realized needed to be changed. > One of the most important things I have learned about these pianos is > how > weak the block and stretcher assembly is. I had the factory rebuild a > type 3 > piano from about 1870. Even after they had done all the work to spec. , > the > stretcher still bowed up terribly when the piano was under tension. It > isn't > very stable, tuning wise, either! > Dale Irwin writes of maybe addressing this with a Falconwood stretcher, > but I would suggest finding some way of getting some steel in there. Maybe > a > heavy piece of angle iron that could be let into the stretch/block before > it is > installed? Somehow, more resistance needs to be found to the rotational > force > upon the pinblock when all the strings are pulling. > I don't think it always true that the older the better. I believe > that > the first pianos coming out of Steinway were designs in progress, and the > really great pianos happened after they had finished their learning curve. > Regards, > > Ed Foote RPT
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC