Hi folks Some of you know that Eric Schandall was one of the instructors at the Nordic PTA convention in Stockholm last weekend. His first class was all about how to voice the New York Steinway and included quite abit about the differences in basic approaches between needled hammers and hammers that use lacquer. First and foremost, I have to say I was very gratified to hear that Steinway NY does NOT use lacquer because it is supposed to be an easier approach. Upon asking him directly about the ease question, he answered that all in all its about the same level of difficulty, tho he was not referring to the physical work required in traditional first voicing with needles mind you. The reason given for Steinways choice in using the lacquer approach is because they feel they do not get the sound they want with needled hammers. I.e. Eric, and Steinway NY are of the opinion that lacquered hammers yield a different sound then needled hammers. He cited more power as one alleged asset, voicing stability as another, and a larger dynamic range due to the very localized affect of needle placement when voicing for soft shift play. Course he didnt really see any advantages to the Hamburg approach.. but then he was from NY :) He DID state that it was his believe that prior to WWII all hammers all over the world needed lacquer. FWIW Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC