---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment At 04:48 PM 9/14/05, you wrote: >Quentin (Sam Quentin? From California?) It's SAN Quentin. > said: "Isn't it sufficient to have "only" one tuning hammer??? If > it is necessary, we can change the tips, but why carrying more than one? > >Well, the answer to this is oblivious, Oblivious??? I thought it "might" be obvious! >but I'll try anyway: OK. > >This is the problem that Einstein* wrastled "WRASTLED" with? >with in his later years: The effect of a singularity in hammerness >is not universal Man, this sounds like you've been working for the government too long! >--at least not univeral in this universe. Specifically, generally >speaking, my Uncle Max and Aunt Min, relatively speaking, and many >odd sorts and even sports have examined this mummified unified >uniform unicorn (why not?) theory of tuningness but found flaws >related to the space-time continuum, that is to say, the space in >your trunk and the time it takes to decide which one to carry or use and .... > >... shall I continuum or quittum while I'm behindum? Heap Ug. Please quit! :-) >Anyway ... > >Even the aboriginal arboreal arbitrarily trivial tribe, the Jerkin >Tuneans of the South Tunean Islands--who subsist largely on a diet >of wrest plankton, hammerhead sharks (#2 tips, usually), bass bass >... which can be caught without trouble on a treble hook, left hook, >right uppercut, wrong underwear, goggle-eyed naked-ladyfish-shaped >artificial bait, that is to say, ensnared from their lair with lurid >leering lures, disnested and bested by Artifice (Melvin's >brother-in-law) and subterfuge (an undersea type of trefuge) but I >digress somewhat ... > >... have never come to grips with the oneness of multiplicity, the >duality of the singular experience, the group singularity of >multiple but plural onenessess, nor, finally, last and least of all, >pant pant, thank goodness, the existential (whateverTHAT means) >existence of exhaustive examinations of the proverbial but >anti-adjectivial tuning lever question: Are two heads really better than one? > >Really now, I ask you. And since, technically, no two tuners know >nor nary care nor ne'er concur (since it can't be answered), why not >have three? Or four? Or more? Hammers Galore! I thought you said you were going to quit! Oh well, I've been disappointed more than one time in my life! Avery ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/c3/d9/b5/94/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC