In the midst of all the insulting and mean-spirited stuff you last posted, I have decided to spend a bit of my valuable time on just this: > > > NOW, I am postulating that grain orientation > was > > an integral, intentional feature of this design. I > am > > incredulous regarding your assertion that a > > quarter-sawn piece of wood will have the same > > characteristics of elasticity and resistance to > > compression set, whether the rings run parallel to > the > > board ( "Pancaked" ) or perpendicular ( "Vertical" > ). > > Show me a reference of any authoritative source that > says > that, please. I've spent lots of hours looking for > just that > information through reference material and Internet > searches, > with nothing at all to indicate that it's true. I've > done > deflection tests on square stock with the annular > rings both > vertical and horizontal, with no appreciable > difference. If > you have evidence to the contrary that isn't just > more off the > top speculative armchair bullshit, I'd really like > to know the > source. I'm quite willing to be educated, but the > information > had better connect with this universe in some way. It would be interesting to know whether those who did these tests examined structural breakdown as a result of repeated kinetic stress, or merely compared the two in a one-off competition. Thanks! G P.S. I am very glad I don't get agitated as easily as you. It is very bad for one's health, and happiness. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC