Replacing Steinway hammers

Ric Brekne ricbrek at broadpark.no
Thu Jun 15 01:51:32 MDT 2006


Appropo replacment of Steinway hammers. Just got a job in on an old O.  
And I run into the problem with hammer shank flanges having the 
centerpin hole a cm longer out again.  Interesting really... the thing 
has (origionally)  realllly light hammers (Stanwood mid to low lights).  
It also has a   6.2 Strike weight ratio, and whippen assist springs.  
Knuckles are 16 mm out from the center and are small diameters.  I have 
a set of new shanks with large knuckles 17(+) mm out from the centers.  
With the new flanges this places the centerpin over 2 mm farther back 
then the origionals.  Essentially, this lowers the ratio both on the 
hammer shank and on the whippen.  Brings it down to 5.3 actually... a 
rather large change.  Origionally with assist springs attached it had a 
30-32 gram BW,  38 grams without the assists.

Im probably going to just use the origional flanges (rebushed) to 
compromise and go with a 3/4 medium set of hammers weightwise.  But I am 
curious as to what others would do in the situation.  No new whippens or 
other parts allowed :) 

Cheers
RicB


 >
 >> Is there a way by which one could positively say if a replacement hammer
 >> on a Steinway (Model M) is a true Steinway (authentic) part, as opposed
 >> to a third party replacement?
 >>
 >> Alex Osopolar77
 >
 >
 >
 > Third party? Who's the second???
 > Ron N

I think that's actually "What is on second."  (Who's on first, you know.)

anon


More information about the Pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC