Hi, Vladan. Thanks for your thorough explanation. This puzzler continues to fascinate, in part because I feel close, but no cigar, to having enough math to figure it out myself. I do understand your point about 2^1/12 and 2^1/1200. Out of context, I knew that. Where I get into trouble is connecting a mathematical representation to a "real-world" problem. I appreciate your (and Amy Z's and John D's) abilities in that regard. Sorry it took me so long to reply. -Mark Schecter V T wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Here is my commentary: > >> The fact that the tone goes flat 10 cents when going >> away merely confirms that the difference between the >> stopped truck and the moving cycle produces a 10 cent >> differential in pitch. > > True. He didn't even slow down! Incredible. > >> So I considered the pitch coming from the stopped >> truck to be 1, and the sound to be travelling at 1100 >> feet per second. In order to reach a pitch of 2, the >> cycle would have to be moving at the speed of sound >> toward the truck, to achieve a total of 2200 feet per >> second closing speed. > > Correct. > >> With that thought in mind, I just calculated that a > 10 >cent increase in pitch equalled 10/1200 of the > speed >of sound, so: > > This is where the trouble started. It is true that > the octave consists of 1200 cents, but the frequency > increments (in Hz) between those 1200 tones are not > linearly divided into equal amounts. Note the > following: > > - One semi-tone is equal to a frequency ratio of > 1.05946 times, but > > - One cent is equal to frequency ratio of 1.0005778 > times. > > Note that 1.0005778 is not equal to 1.05946/100, just > as one semi-tone is not equal to a pitch increment of > 1+(1/12)=1.08333 times. > > You have to multiply 1.0005778 one hundred times _with > itself_ (raise it to the hundredth power) to get > 1.05946. > > So, the principle is that each higher pitch is equal > to the previous pitch multiplied by a constant. That > constant will depend on the pitch increment you > choose. If you want to step in semi-tone increments, > the constant that defines two adjacent steps will be > 2^(1/12). If you want to step in one cent increments, > that constant will be 2^(1/1200). If you want to step > in octave increments, the constant will be 2^(1/1). I > am using "^" as the symbol for "raised to the the > power of ...". > > Some examples: > > One cent sharp from A440 is: > > 440*1.0005778 = 440.254228Hz > > Note that the 1 cent increment up from 440 Hz is equal > to 0.254228 Hz > > Two cents sharp from A440 is equal to: > > 440*1.0005778*1.0005778 = 440.508602 Hz > > The difference in pitch between the last two tones is > 0.2543745 Hz, which is slightly different from > 0.254228. It doesn't seem like much, but if you make > that small error 1200 times in a row, it turns into an > ice cream disaster. > >> 10 cents higher than nominal pitch = >> 10/1200 * (speed of sound in air) >> or 1/120 * (1100 ft/sec) = 9.1666 ft/sec (speed of >> bicycle) >> 9.166 ft/sec * 3600 secs/hour = 33,000 ft/hour >> 33,000 / 5280 (ft/mi) = 6.25 mph > >> However, you arrived at 2 meters/second, which equals >> 7200 meters/hour, >> which translates to 4.47 miles per hour. So would you >> tell me how you got there? Thanks! >> >> -Mark Schecter > > The other small difference which is not really > relevant is that I used 345m/sec for the velocity of > sound which is slightly off from 1100 ft/sec. > > Vladan > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC