This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Something added to the action...hammer return rail was turned down too = far and he added cloth to bring the hammers back up to correct blow dis= tance...lost motion in action...keys lowered a bit....I trying to do th= is fast before you reveal the answer... David Ilvedson, RPT Pacifica, California Original message From: "Joseph Alkana" To: "Pianotech List" Received: 2/28/2006 8:04:50 PM Subject: Re: Puzzeler from Seattle Whoa! That's really out in left field! But, yes, I did see something ad= ded to the action. If I told you where it was I'd give away the answer,= unfortunately. Couple of more minutes and I am going to reveal the winner. Joseph Alkana RPT ----- Original Message ----- From: piano2ba1@att.net To: Pianotech List Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:56 PM Subject: Re: Puzzeler from Seattle Was there anything you could see added? If the glides were set right, c= ould it be that front rail punchings were removed and the back rail was= shimmed and the hammer line reset? -------------- Original message from "Joseph Alkana" <josephspiano@comc= ast.net>: -------------- > I've seen that on a piano that had new shanks and flanges, where the = old > shank had an old style brambach knuckle. Resultant geometry required = someway > to get let off, hence extra long button. But no cigar here. Try again= . > Joseph Alkana RPT > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "David Love" > To: "'Pianotech List'" > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:13 PM > Subject: RE: Puzzeler from Seattle > > > > OK. So the balancier leather was making noise and someone glued on = some > > felt > > to quiet the knock. While they were at it, they glued on a new leto= ff > > button. > > > > D! avid Love > > davidlovepianos@comcast.net > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, here's a little mystery question for you regarding the weird fe= eling > > action of a Small Baldwin grand piano. > > > > I arrived today for a regulation job at customer's house. Took a qu= ick > > tour > > of the action with my fingers, and proclaimed the action a mess. Le= t off > > appeared to be about a half an inch from the strings, Drop was real= ly low > > and keys were pretty much evenly low from factory spec, but just sl= ightly, > > dip was a very fat 3/8". But here's the weird thing that caught me = off > > guard > > for a few mystifying moments: The hammers were already adjusted to = be a 1 > > 3/4" to 1 7/8" and were pretty much in a good straight line. > > > > > > Yikes! I thought. Where am I going ! to get enough whippen lift fro= m??? OK, > > that was the quickie analysis. What was wrong with the action set u= p as it > > was? Original hammers, and not too worn, by the way. > > > > Joseph Alkana RPT > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives = > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ba/6d/c7/ab/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC