[CAUT] Baldwin SD-10

Erwinspiano at aol.com Erwinspiano at aol.com
Tue Oct 24 22:17:29 MDT 2006



Ric Wrote

I would just have loved to compare the amount of  real leakage before and 
after on this job.  I've seen and done this  exact kind of job myself on 
a number of occasions and find that while  string noise is affected 
significantly, leakage across to the  front length per se is nearly 
unchanged. Demonstrated by the fact  that when you measure the output of 
the un damped speaking length for  similar pluck strengths of the front 
length one is pressed to find a  measurable difference.
 Hi Ric
   Yes , I love A --B comparisons..they don't  lie
  I'm not sure we are objecting to the same thing  though.  My opinion is 
that I dislike the amount of noise coming from the  front duplex, Of any piano 
when it distracts from the sound by the sheer  extraneous- ness of it, & usually 
I believe it is caused from the energy  leaking under the capo due to low 
draft angles & worn capos.  To me  this is demonstratable in pianos I have worked 
with & is not a question in  my mind.
  I rebuilt a Older 1911 B with a low draft angle. I left  it unchanged. It 
got  a new board etc. It seems to bleed or  create a good deal of extraneous 
duplex noise. Although I don't like the noise,  it is still a wonderful sounding 
piano by all who play it , including  me.  However,  I would find the sound 
more attractive if it  didn't make all that racket. Again that's my story & I'm 
sticking to  it.
  The Stwy B I just delivered did break a few strings  prior to the decision 
to rebuild it but the hammers were hard & flat ,  obviously lack of hammer 
care was a contributor. BTW this is a teaching  piano.
 SO much of our results are subjective but when they are  reaffirmed over & 
over again by us then we / I begin to regard them as a  fact  comfortable of 
espousing.  I think we on this list do this  all the time.
  I think we as a sensitive group of technicians are  sometimes worry too 
much about what other people think. If we have a good  rational reason for 
asserting a thing & can speak of it inteligentlly, then  we have done out best to 
state a reasonable postion & we can take confidence  in our own experience.  It 
is, after all ....All we have. That and an open  mind.
  Regards
  Dale
 



Again... its my experience that leakage across to the front  length per 
se and string noises are not all that related.  Leakage as  it does 
relate to string noises doesn't get past the termination... that  energy 
is all used up in the functioning of the buzzing between the string  and 
the termination.

As for the new  B.... I'd very much like  to know whether or not their 
basic front length specs were changed along  with the counter bearing angle.

btw... I agree one hundred percent on  the comment about opinions. Well said.

Cheers
RicB

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20061025/7ac6bfab/attachment.html 


More information about the Pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC