Kent, David, et the rest of y'all I find myself in the position of more or less siding with Kent and David Love here. Actually I'm siding with Jon Page's procedure (which is more or less where these two are pointing) as he was the first to turn me on to it. If your basic regulation is really fine to begin with including the correct spread the optimum position for the capstan is more or less a given. At least from an optimal regulation point of view. In this thinking the strike weight ratio falls where the chips demand as it were. Perhaps Jon might pipe in here. Once capstan position is set and the new SW ratio taken one can decide what to do further with regard to hammer strike weights, balance weight, and how to counterbalance (i.e. with or without assists). I liked this approach from the minute Jon described it to me as it secures a kind of optimum regulating situation at the same time as it utilizes what I like best about the Stanwood system.... namely balancing the action. Cheers RicB Kent, Have you considered the fact that if you move the capstan to make the key ratio change your changing the wippen ratio as well? A more complete picture of the effects from moving a capstan line are found by seeing what kind of strike weight ratio a given capstan position will yield. Helpfully hopefully, David Stanwood >OK, so you establish a new capstan line. Excellent. As long as I'm >checking and controlling the key ratio, I'll guard against >perpetuating mistakes in the original drilling. Thanks, I appreciate it. > > >Kent
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC