I suspect there are enough RPT's who would balk at such a thing that the PTG would not be able to sustain itself due to the loss of membership. les bartlett _____ From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of ITUNEPIANO at aol.com Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 10:45 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: tough enough RPT's should have to retest every 5-10 years, in my opinion. It could be informal, such as tuning before a chapter meeting for evaluation by members. Either the piano sounds good, or it doesn't. If it doesn't, a formal tuning test should be required to retain RPT status. Also, continuing education should be a requirement, not optional. Problem is, if it's too tough to be an RPT, enrollment decreases, and with it goes PTG income. Bob Maret, RPT Piano Technician _____ Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com <http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982> . No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.13/947 - Release Date: 08/11/2007 2:29 PM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20070812/62986eb0/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC