Hi Matt Thanks for your detailed and interesting reply to all of us who responded. As I mentioned to Stephane, with Stephen Birkett close by you will no doubt have a hard time veering off the objective course. Seems like you are breaking down the kinds of concepts you'd like to <<define>> or clarify into two groups. The first being more mechanics related and easier to put a finger on. The second moving into very difficult ground as you mention in your response to David M. I'd be interested in hearing an airing of terms you think it might be possible to attempt some kind of quantification, and just a little about what kind of quantifications you are thinking would apply. From your first post I got the impression you were looking at how different soundboards themselves respond, and ways of attempting to put at least some qualitative descriptors to these various measurable responses. That kind of implies to me looking at several soundboards as isolated from other variables as possible.... which would become real expensive and cumbersome real quickly. But in another response you mention manipulation of hammers, and other <<superficial>> (from a piano technisk perspective) issues. I'd be also interested in your initial thinking about how you see these variables affecting soundboard modes/frequencies. Of course its too expensive for practicalities... but I'd just love to see someday someone isolated soundboard design issues and subject them to this kind of research. There has been some done, mostly in relation to rib dimensions... but only enough to whet ones whistle as it were. You are no doubt aware of the Five Lectures available on the Swedish PTA site. But just in case I will post the link once more for general interest anyways. http://www.speech.kth.se/music/5_lectures/ Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC