Recently I moved and tuned a piano for a church that built a new building. Moving their old pipe organ was an expensive process, in addition to the making the improvements that were needed. There was a strong contingent that almost prevailed in switching to a digital instrument with the argument that it would be less expensive. As the organ installer and I were discussing this situation, he said that a couple of denominations had done a study comparing the long range cost of owning a pipe organ versus an electronic organ. The result was an astonishing savings in money (something like 50% or more) by owning (and even maintaining)a pipe organ. The same could be said of an acoustic piano versus electronic, I would think. Of course this could vary according to which brand of piano you are discussing. Bob Hull --- pbmosley <mosley at classicnet.net> wrote: > We don't want parts, we want to replace it with > something new, better and cheaper. Schools, > churches, teachers, and individuals do it everyday. > Most kids wouldn't want a cell phone that was 3 > months old, it is way outdated! I am not arguing > what someone should or should not do, there is just > a reality that cannot be missed. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC