I used the cyber-tuner in Mac form, on PC form, on the handheld form. I began with an SOT way back in the 80's , then SAT and in 97 to the Mac Cyber-tuner. 1.5 years ago I bought a new SAT III. I found that the SAT was less cumbersome since only 3 samples had to be taken, rather than 5, and overall the SAT was easier to use, especially considering battery power. With the SAT III there are several choices of the kind of tuning you want to do. The original stretch tuning, as per the SOT, but built in, or the FAC tunings or to just tune the piano manually using intervals. That is just my opinion. James James Grebe Piano Tuning & Repair Member of Master Piano Technicians. Registered Piano Technician of the Piano Technicians Guild for over 30 years. "Member of the Year" in 1989 Creator of Handsome Hardwood Caster Cups, Piano Benches, Writing Instruments,Table Timepieces (314) 608-4137 1526 Raspberry Lane Arnold, MO 63010 Researcher of St. Louis Theatre History BECOME WHAT YOU BELIEVE! pianoman at accessus.net Jimpianowood at yahoo.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "carlteplitski" <koko99 at shaw.ca> To: "Pianotechlist" <pianotech at ptg.org> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 12:13 AM Subject: ETDs Have been reading many messages re. ETDs, and most people have compared the Acc- tuner to the VT. Surprised that no mention has been made, so far, re. Cybertuner ? Comparisons ?? I have an Accu - tuner I'm quite happy with. Carl / Winnipeg
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC