I'll admit that I know little of this, and have, in the past, just been happy if it "looks pretty good". But I'm about to restore the finest upright I've ever seen: a 1902 Ivers and Pond scale 19, 56" tall, and want to be more "scientifical". It does have bearing all along the bridge, but I wonder if it's enough, or even too much ? ( There seems to be plenty in the bass, also. ) I was planning to re-crown the board ( a la D.L. Bullock's system, which hes' successfully used for years --and I'll be very happy to share ) but don't want to "overdo it" ! In any event, this seems an ideal opportunity to share "before and after" specs with everyone, about how well this system works, So: I have the brass thingee from Schaff, and feeler guages, the dial indicator bearing checker with three feet ( also from Schaff ) and an old busted Lowell guage. ( Which I'd get another of, if convinced it was worth it. ) Which of these should I use, and what would be acceptable measurements for a HUGE old upright like this? Can I determine it with the brass thingee and the feeler guages, or the dial indicator ? Or do I need the angle of deflection indicated by the Lowell guage ? ( Sorry for being such a dope. ) Thump ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC